Psychiatr. pro Praxi, 2002; 2: 59-60

Diagnostický proces a súčasná psychiatrická prax

MUDr. Ivan André PhD
Psychiatrická klinika FN a LF UK Bratislava

Keywords: diagnostic systems, diagnostic approach, diagnosis of syndromes.

Published: December 31, 2002  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
André I. Diagnostický proces a súčasná psychiatrická prax. Psychiatr. praxi. 2002;3(2):59-60.

Explicitné diagnostické systémy, ktoré sú výsledkom súčasného poznania v psychiatrii, majú predovšetkým pragmatickú hodnotu. Diagnostická práca by ale nemala byť redukovaná len na jednoduchý, explicitnými kritériami formulovaný proces. V práci sa predkladá diagnostický postup, kde sa popri platných diagnostických kategóriách uplatňuje aj syndrómová diagnostika v zmysle klinicko-patogenetického poňatia syndrómu. Taký postup umožňuje prirodzenejšie sledovanie vývoja a dynamiky duševných porúch, predchádza sa nežiadúcim diagnostickým revíziam.

Klúčové slová: diagnostické systémy, diagnostický postup, syndrómová diagnostika.

Diagnostic evaluation and contemporary psychiatric practice

Explicit diagnostic protocols, resulting from the current knowledge of psychiatry, are mainly of pragmatic value. Diagnostic evaluation should not be reduced merely to a simple, clearly formulated or defined process. The diagnostic evaluation, including the diagnosis of clinico-pathological syndromes and valid diagnostic categories, is given in this article. This approach allows a more natural follow-up of the evolution and dynamics of psychiatric disorders.

Download citation

References

  1. Berner P. Diagnosen-versus syndrombezogene Forschung. In: Schneider, F. et al. (Hrsg.): Perspektiven der Psychiatrie, Forschung-Diagnostik-Therapie. Stuttgart, Jena, N York, G Fischer V. 1995: 246.
  2. Fleischer J. Klinicko-psychopatologické problémy. Psychiatrická klinika LFUK a FN, 1997, 108.
  3. Jablensky A. Diagnostic criteria in psychiatry: A Straitjacket or a prop? Eur Psychiatry; 1991; 6: 323-329. Go to original source...
  4. Jaspers K. Allgemeine Psychopathologie. 8. Aufl. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, Springer V 1965: 748. Go to original source...
  5. Molčan J, Čaplová T, Fleischer J, Kolibáš E, Koníková M, Novotný V, Polák Ľ, Žucha I. Sledovanie zmien psychiatrických diagnóz v priebehu diagnostického procesu v rámci jedného ataku choroby. Čs psychiat 80, 1984: 72-80. Go to original source...
  6. Mombour W. Die neueren nosologischen Klassifikationsverfahren, historische und neue Aspekte. In: Psychiatrie, ein Lehrbuch für Klinik, Praxis und Beratung. G Fischer V, 1995: 17-31.
  7. Mundt Ch. Endogenität von Psychosen - Anachronismus oder aktueller Wegweiser für die Pathogeneseforschung? Nervenarzt 62, 1991: 3-15. Go to PubMed...
  8. Žucha I, Čaplová T. Explicitné kritéria. Prednáška na klinickom seminári, Bratislava 3. 4. 1998.




Psychiatry for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.