Psychiatr. praxi 2018; 19(3e): e10-e19 | DOI: 10.36290/psy.2018.037

The experimental use of the Olomouc test of figural fluency on people with Parkinson´s disease

Mgr. Alena Háková1, doc. PhDr. Martin Lečbych, Ph.D.2, Mgr. Markéta Večerková3
1 Psychiatrická klinika FN HK
2 klinický psycholog v privátní ordinaci klinické psychologie a psychoterapie v Uherském Brodě
3 Neurologická klinika FN Olomouc

This study refers to the experimental application of the Olomouc Figural Fluency Test (OFFT), used mostly for executive functions (EF) assessment, inpatients with Parkinson disease. OFFT was administered as a part of a battery of tests to a group of 30 patients. There were included individuals withidiopathic Parkinson disease G20 (n = 17) and with the diagnosis of secondary Parkinsonism G21 (n = 13) in the group. The test battery comprisedGraphomotor test in two levels (GPMT1 and GPMT2), Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (RCFT), Verbal Fluency test (FAS), Categorial Fluency test, OFFTand Beck Depression Inventory scale (BDI-II). According to the literature and research up to now on this topic we assumed that the deterioratedmotor activity of the patients will influence negatively the performance in OFFT. First of all we compared our results with previous performancecharacteristics in OFFT in non-clinical population (n = 146). In the second step we focused on considering the influence of the graphomotor abilitieson the performance in OFFT in our clinical group. The correlation analysis proved statistically significant negative correlation between the time ofGPMT and the total performance (TP) in OFFT (TP and GPMT1 = -0,43; TP and GPMT2 = -0,46) and between the time of GPMT1 and the total numberof figures (TN; r = -0,40). Furthermore the correlations between TP and other test methods were proved to be statistically significant too. Theinfluence of the depressive symptomatology on the performance in any of used tests was not confirmed. Equally no difference was registered inthe performance of the group G20 and G21. The research shows that the quantitive performance in OFFT is to certain extent negatively influencedby the deteriorated level of graphomotor abilities. However the OFFT seems to be a useful additional tool for qualitative analysis of the executivefunctions. Among the limits of this study count a small sample of participants, their occasional selection and heterogenity.

Keywords: executive functions, Parkinson´s disease, figural fluency, neuropsychology, motoric

Published: October 15, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Háková A, Lečbych M, Večerková M. The experimental use of the Olomouc test of figural fluency on people with Parkinson´s disease. Psychiatr. praxi. 2018;19(E-verze 3/18):e10-19. doi: 10.36290/psy.2018.037.
Download citation

References

  1. Preiss M, Kučerová H, et al. Neuropsychologie v neurologii. Praha: Grada Publishing 2006.
  2. Robinson G, Shallice T, Bozzali M, Copolotti L. The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests. Brain, 2012; 135: 2202-2214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Kraybill ML, Suchy Y. Evaluating the role of motor regulation in figural fluency: Partialing variance in the Ruff Figural Fluency Test. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2008; 30(8): 903-912. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press 2004.
  5. Ruff RM, Light RH, Evans RW. The Ruff Figural Fluency Test: A Normative Study With Adults. Developmental Neuropsychology, 1987; 3(1): 37-51. Go to original source...
  6. Lečbych M. Olomoucký test figurální fluence: příručka pro praxi. Olomouc: Institut psychologických služeb. 2014a. Go to original source...
  7. Lečbych M. Vývoj Olomouckého testu figurální fluence a jeho možnosti při screeningu kognitivních poruch u osob seniorského věku - pilotní studie. Československá psychologie, 2014b; 68(6): 524-534. Go to original source...
  8. Lečbych M, Vaverka M. Experimentální užití Olomouckého testu figurální fluence u osob závislých na alkoholu. Psychologie a její kontexty. 2014c; 5(Suppl.): 117-127. Go to original source...
  9. Ambler Z, Bednařík J, Růžička E, et al. Klinická neurologie, speciální část. Praha: TRITON 2010.
  10. Rektor I, Rektorová I. Parkinsonova nemoc a příbuzná onemocnění v praxi. Praha: TRITON 1999.
  11. Rektor I, Rektorová I, et al. Centrální poruchy hybnosti v praxi. Praha: TRITON 2003.
  12. Preiss M, et al. Klinická neuropsychologie. Praha: Grada Publishing 1998.
  13. Jaywant AJ, Musto G, Neargarder S, Gilbert KS, Cronin-Golomb AC. The effect of Parkinson's disease subgroups on verbal and nonverbal fluency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2014; 36(3): 278-289. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Háková A. Experimentální užití Olomouckého testu figurální fluence u osob s Parkinosonovou chorobou. Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci 2016.
  15. Košč M, Novák J. Rey - Osterriethova komplexní figura TKF. Brno: Psychodiagnostika s. r. o. 1997.
  16. Preiss M. Verbální fluence, metoda vyšetření poškození mozku u dětí a dospělých. Československá psychologie, 1997; 3: 244-249.
  17. Kopeček M. Velikost efektu v krátkých kognitivních testech mezi mladými zdravými jedinci a seniory - pilotní studie. Česká a Slovenská Psychiatrie, 2010; 106(1): 9-14.
  18. Sherman EMS, Strauss E, Spreen OA. Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms and Commentary, Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
  19. Goebel S, Atanassov L, Köhner G, Mehdorn HM, Leplow B. Understanding quantitative and qualitative figural fluency in patiens with Parkinson's disease. Neurol Sci, 2013; 34: 1383-1390. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Robinson G, Shallice T, Bozzali M, Copolotti L. The differing roles of the frontal cortex in fluency tests. Brain, 2012; 135: 2202-2214. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Tucha L, Aschenbrenner S, Koerts J, Lange KW. TheFive-Point Test: Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for Children and Adults. PLoS One 2012. Go to original source...




Psychiatry for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.