Psychiatr. praxi. 2012;13(2):58-60

Pathological intoxication

doc.MUDr.Pavel Pavlovský, CSc.
Psychiatrická klinika 1. LF UK a VFN Praha

The paper presents the views on pathological intoxication, a rare condition that can be characterized as an abnormal response to alcohol

use; its main symptom is a qualitative disorder of consciousness in the form of obnubilation. Diagnosing this condition is of essential

importance in forensic psychiatry; when a crime was committed during its course, the findings of an expert assessment concerning the

loss of cognitive and control capacities consequently imply declaring insanity. The opinions on the causative factors of pathological

intoxication vary, particularly in relation to what degree organic brain involvement, a pathological EEG finding, the amount of alcohol

used and a number of other supportive or less significant factors contribute; the author considers as decisive for diagnosing pathological

intoxication the presence of typical psychopathological features including pathological behaviour with psychotic motivation that is in

conflict with a premorbid personality. In accordance with numerous other authors, he holds the opinion that the level of alcoholaemia

cannot be an exclusion criterion for establishing the diagnosis of pathological intoxication.

premorbid personality, alcoholaemia, significance for forensic assessment.

Keywords: pathological intoxication, complicated intoxication, clouding of consciousness, psychotic motivation, acting in conflict with

Published: April 23, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pavlovský P. Pathological intoxication. Psychiatr. praxi. 2012;13(2):58-60.
Download citation

References

  1. Mysliveček Z. Soudní psychiatrie. In: Hájek F. Soudní lékařství, Praha 1937.
  2. Mysliveček Z. Obecná psychiatrie. St. zdrav. nakl., Praha 1959.
  3. Knobloch F, Knoblochová J. Soudní psychiatrie pro právníky a lékaře. Orbis, Praha 1965.
  4. Dufek M. Soudní psychiatrie. Orbis, Praha 1976.
  5. Stuchlík S. Soudně psychiatrický význam patické opilosti. Čs. Psychiat. 1970; 66: 289-292.
  6. Profous J. Problematika patologické opilosti a patologických afektů v podnapilosti v soudně psychiatrické praxi. Čs. Psychiat. 1974; 70: 29-36.
  7. Miššík T. K problematike syndrómu patickej opilosti a jej súdnoznaleckému posúdeniu. Protialkoholický obzor 1975; 10: 157-159.
  8. Útrata R. Repetitorium forenzní alkoholologie. VÚPs, Praha-Bohnice, 1986.
  9. Skála J, a kol. Závislost na alkoholu a jiných drogách. Avicenum, Praha 1987.
  10. Hanzlíček L. Psychiatrická encyklopedie, díl V. VÚPs, Praha 1982.
  11. Nešpor K. Návykové nemoci. In: Höschl C, Libiger J, Švestka J. Psychiatrie. Tigis, Praha 2002.
  12. Winkler P. Der, ,Psychopathologische Rausch". Diagnostische Artefakt oder zuverlassige psychiatrische Diagnose? Nervenarzt. 1999; 70: 803-809. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Nedopil N. Forensische Psychiatrie. Thieme, 2007. Go to original source...
  14. Mezinárodní klasifikace nemocí - 10. revize. SZO Ženeva 1992.
  15. Duševní poruchy a poruchy chování. (MKN-10). Diagnostická kritéria pro výzkum. SZO, Ženeva 1993. Psychiatrické centrum Praha 1996.
  16. DSM-IV., APA 1994.
  17. André I, Hunáková D. Vplyv úrazu hlavy na priebeh alkoholovej ebriety. 21. slovensko-česká súdnopsychiatrická konferencia. Bánovce nad Bebravou, 1998.
  18. Pokora J. Patická opilost. 31. soudně psychiatrická konference. Valtice, 2008.
  19. Švarc J. Koreferát k přednášce J. Pokory, ,Patická opilost v soudně psychiatrické praxi". 31. soudně psychiatrická konference. Valtice, 2008.
  20. Pavlovský P, a kol. Soudní psychiatrie a psychologie. 3. vyd. Grada, Praha 2009.
  21. Hastík S, Loncková K. Komplikovanosť znaleckého posudzovania komplikovanej opilosti. 33. soudně psychiatrická konference. Trenčianské Teplice, 2010.
  22. Fleischer J, Žucha I. Kazuistický príspevok k diferenciálnej diagnóze medzi patickou a komplikovanou ebrietou. Protialkoholický obzor 1978; 13: 293-298.




Psychiatry for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.