Psychiatr. praxi 2019; 20(1): 17-20 | DOI: 10.36290/psy.2019.004

Sexual violence and paraphilia, does pathological sexual aggression exists or not?

MUDr. Marek Páv, Ph.D., MBA1,2, MUDr. Slavoj Brichcín1
1 Psychiatrická nemocnice Bohnice
2 Psychiatrická klinika, 1. lékařská fakulta Univerzita Karlova a Všeobecná fakultní nemocnice v Praze

Only a minority of perpetrators of violent sexual violence acts has a diagnosed paraphilia. The risk of committing violent behavior is associated with the diagnosis of sadism and pedophilia (in the case of acts against children). A significant percentage of acts are committed by persons who since the 1960s have been diagnosed as a group of paraphilic offenders, distinguishable from sadistic perpetrators and nonparaphillic offenders. In Czech tradition, this disorder is classified as pathological sexual aggression. Their sexually aggressive behavior (sometimes referred to as predatory behavior) is characterized by skipping the stages of partner interaction; the victims are usually unknown, non-cooperating women. While DSM-5 authors include this disorder as a research item, in ICD-11, these patients can be classified as Paraphilic Disorder Involving Non-Consenting Individuals. To diagnose this atypical sexual arousal manifested by sexual thoughts, fantasies, and desires for a non-consenting person, the long-term profile of these fantasies or actions is needed, in exclusion of other paraphilic and mental disorders.

Keywords: paraphilia, sexual aggression, pathologic sexual aggression, MKN-11, non‑consentingperson

Published: April 5, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Páv M, Brichcín S. Sexual violence and paraphilia, does pathological sexual aggression exists or not? Psychiatr. praxi. 2019;20(1):17-20. doi: 10.36290/psy.2019.004.
Download citation

References

  1. Weiss P. Sexuologie. Prague: GRADA Publishing; 2010. 724 p.
  2. Blatníková Š, Faridová P, Zeman P. Násilná sexuální kriminalita. Institut pro kriminologii a sociální prevenci Nám. 14. října 12, Praha 5; 2014.
  3. Baur E, Forsman M, Santtila P, Johansson A, Sandnabba K, L?ngström N. Paraphilic Sexual Interests and Sexually Coercive Behavior: A Population-Based Twin Study. Arch Sex Behav [Internet]. 2016 Jul 11 [cited 2018 Jul 8]; 45(5): 1163-1172. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10508-015-0674-2 Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Abel GG, Becker J V, Cunningham-Rathner J, Mittelman M, Rouleau JL. Multiple paraphilic diagnoses among sex offenders. Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1988; 16(2): 153-168. Go to PubMed...
  5. Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon K. The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005; 73(6): 1154-1163. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Langevin R, Lang RA. Substance abuse among sex offenders. Ann Sex Res. 1990 Go to original source...
  7. Woodworth M, Freimuth T, Hutton EL, Carpenter T, Agar AD LM. High-risk sexual offenders: an examination of sexual fantasy, sexual paraphilia, psychopathy, and offence characteristics. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2013; 36(2): 144-156. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Langevin R. Sexual offenses and traumatic brain injury. Brain Cogn [Internet]. 2006; 60(2): 206-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez
  9. Delbello MP, Soutullo CA, Zimmerman ME, Sax KW, Williams JR, McElroy SL, et al. Traumatic brain injury in individuals convicted of sexual offenses with and without bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 1999; 89(3): 281-286. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Mellan J., Nedoma K. PJ. Forensic evaluation of sex offenders. Ces Psychiatr. 1972; 68(4): 218-222.
  11. Kolářský A, Madlafousek J, Novotná V. Stimuli eliciting sexual arousal in males who offend adult women: An experimental study. Arch Sex Behav. 1978; 7(2): 79-87. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Zvěřina J. PJ. Psychopathological findings in sexual aggressors. Ces Psychiatr. 1984; 80(5): 298-302.
  13. Brichcín S. [Atypical sexual aggressiveness of 3 young deviants]. Cesk Psychiatr [Internet]. 1969 Dec [cited 2018 Aug 28];65(6):401-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5362979 Go to PubMed...
  14. W L Marshall, et al. Sex Offenders: A Feminist Perspective (From Handbook of Sexual Assault: Issues, Theories, and Treatment of the Offender. Plenum Press 233 Spring Street New York, NY 10013 United States of America; 1990.
  15. Prentky RAKA. Handbook of Sexual Assault. W. L. Marshall, D. R. Laws & HEB, editor. Springer; 1990.
  16. Freund K, Seto MC. Preferential rape in the theory of courtship disorder. Arch Sex Behav. 1998; 27(5): 433-443. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Langevin R. Erotic Preference, Gender Identity, and Aggression in Men. 1st ed. New York: Routledge; 1984. 376 p.
  18. Abel. G.,G., Rouleau J. L. The nature and extent of sexual assault. In: Marshall, Laws B, editor. Handbook of sexual assault. New York: Plenum Press; 1990. p. 9-21. Go to original source...
  19. Money J. Forensic sexology: Paraphilic serial rape (Biastophilia) and lust murder (Erotophonophilia). Am J Psychother. 1990; 44(1): 26-36. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Kolářský, A., Brichcín S. Nezávislá sexodiagnostika. Psychiatrie. 2000; (4): 97-111.
  21. Quinsey VL. Coercive paraphilic disorder. Arch Sex Behav. 2010; 39(2): 405-410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Stern P. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder in the DSM: The right diagnosis for the right reasons. Arch Sex Behav. 2010; 39(6): 1443-1447. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  23. Thornton D. Evidence regarding the need for a diagnostic category for a coercive paraphilia. Arch Sex Behav. 2010; 39(2): 411-418. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Balon R. Controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of paraphilias. Vol. 39, Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy. 2013. p. 7-20. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Knight RA, Sims-Knight J, Guay JP. Is a separate diagnostic category defensible for paraphilic coercion? J Crim Justice. 2013; 41(2): 90-99. Go to original source...
  26. Wollert R. Paraphilic coercive disorder does not belong in DSM-5 for statistical, historical, conceptual, and practical reasons. Vol. 40, Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2011. p. 1097-1098. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Agalaryan A, Rouleau JL. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder: An Unresolved Issue. Arch Sex Behav. 2014; 43(7): 1253-1256. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  28. Longpré N, Guay JP, Knight RA, Benbouriche M. Sadistic Offender or Sexual Sadism? Taxometric Evidence for a Dimensional Structure of Sexual Sadism. Arch Sex Behav. 2018; 47(2): 403-416. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Krueger RB, Kaplan MS. Paraphilic diagnoses in DSM-5. Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci. 2012; 49(4): 248-254. Go to PubMed...
  30. Briken P, Bourget D, Dufour M. Sexual Sadism in Sexual Offenders and Sexually Motivated Homicide. Vol. 37, Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2014. p. 215-30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Švarc J. "Patologická sexuální agresivita" v praxi. Psychiatr praxi. 2017; 18(2): 81-83. Go to original source...
  32. Seto MC, Lalumiére ML, Harris GT, Chivers ML. The sexual responses of sexual sadists. J Abnorm Psychol. 2012; 121(3): 739-753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  33. Harenski CL, Thornton DM, Harenski KA, Decety J, Kiehl KA. Increased frontotemporal activation during pain observation in sexual sadism: Preliminary findings. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(3):283-292. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Psychiatry for Practice

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.